I haven’t had much to say about sequestration, but I encountered something extraordinary in its gall last night. Writing in The Washington Times, Stephen Dinan tells of recent correspondence directing one inquiring official to make the pain of sequestration, not potential mitigation, a top priority:
In the internal email, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service official Charles Brown said he asked if he could try to spread out the sequester cuts in his region to minimize the impact, and he said he was told not to do anything that would lessen the dire impacts Congress had been warned of.
“We have gone on record with a notification to Congress and whoever else that ‘APHIS would eliminate assistance to producers in 24 states in managing wildlife damage to the aquaculture industry, unless they provide funding to cover the costs.’ So it is our opinion that however you manage that reduction, you need to make sure you are not contradicting what we said the impact would be,” Mr. Brown, in the internal email, said his superiors told him.
Above all, make it hurt.
Yes, you are processing that correctly. The President of the United States, his supposedly legendary oratory on his latest cross-country swing having failed him, has apparently instructed those in his administration dealing with the practical, on-the-ground effects of this crisis to inflict pain, if at all possible. (And even if this is not explicit direction, he is obviously more than happy to allow the attitude to proliferate.)
In other words, he now seeks to actively punish the American people for their lack of vision.
In Barack Obama we have many things, but we do not have a leader. On this count, we have a tedious urchin who, cast out of the grown-up party and banished to his room, now registers his displeasure by banging on the ceiling and bellowing “ooh, they’re gonna be sorry!” to no one in particular.
Of course, The Washington Times is only a filthy right-wing rag, right? I mean, so far, the only outfits to pick up the column and run it are other journalistic Gomorrahs like (contort face into suitable grimace) FoxNews.com. Maybe this is the start, though. Maybe the media juggernaut that worked ceaselessly to reelect this jackass will finally rediscover its stones and start to produce some actual journalism.
(You know, the kind they just got finished excoriating Bob Woodward for.)
You might also like:
- “…we were going to do the right thing, even if short-term it was unpopular.” – Barack Obama
Hey, guess what? It seems that three weeks from a historic midterm pasting, President Obama is reali… - “Most transparent administration” ever knew from beginning that Lois Lerner’s email wasn’t lost
The Obama administration has known all along—through all of the histrionics about damaged hard drive… - U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) has big ears
I was thinking Barack Obama might make things interesting in ’08, but sheesh, does he seem thin-skin… - What shall become of Kennedy’s old Senate seat?
Will it be Republican Scott Brown, or Democrat Martha Coakley? The race is a statistical dead heat, … - “What we said was you could keep it if it hasn’t changed since the law was passed.” – Barack Obama
That’s what our esteemed president is telling us today. That’s how he’s explaining when he said “if …
Much to my surprise, the NY Times dared speak up.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/07/us/politics/spending-cuts-complicate-obamas-free-time.html?_r=0
Even so, it’s full of signature NYT touches. For example, it makes it sound like George W. Bush played golf all the damned time, when he stopped in August 2003, saying “playing golf during a war just sends the wrong signal.”