Feb 212017
 

I would guess some people will compare Milo Yiannopoulos to Icarus.

I am reminded instead of one of my stepbrother’s years-ago adventures. Long story made very short: bunch of buddies together, one had a go-kart, and oh yeah, there was some beer. Every time they refueled the kart they were using a bottle of 104 Octane Boost in the gasoline. Then someone got the bright idea to run the kart on only 104 Octane Boost. Holy shit, that made the kart go fast!

(For 30 minutes or so. Then the engine burned up. I believe I remember the words “melted piston” being tossed around.)

I was momentarily fascinated by Milo Yiannopoulos. I appreciated a lot of what he had to say about the scourge of political correctness and the warped objectives of fourth-wave feminism.

But mostly I watched because his numerous detractors blew through “dislike” so quickly. He fostered near-immediate visceral hatred in liberal ideologues, at an intensity I really hadn’t seen since Rush Limbaugh 20 years ago. It was hard for me to see why. He told you right to your face that he was an asshole and a provocateur. If I tell you I’m trying to piss you off, and then you get pissed off to the point of meltdown, then…?

Thing is, you could always smell the heat. This was not a guy who ran any slower than 6,000 RPM. The engine had some power, but it was also operating at most of capacity all the time. As that olfactory cocktail of hot metal and stressed oil became richer and more pervasive, it wasn’t hard to guess that we probably weren’t headed for an orderly gear-down and cool-off.

Turns out Milo’s melted piston was saying it was just dandy for adult men to have sex with young boys.

I had been intrigued enough to want to read his book, but Simon & Schuster isn’t going to publish it now. That’s the right call. You can’t make extensive comments attempting to legitimize pedophilia and still expect to sit at the grown-up table (however tenuously you were doing so).

We’ll have some disingenuous machinations now, during which his very blithest fans will try to reconstruct a rational base on which to support him, and some number of his detractors will try to install him as the universal leader of all conservatism, now that he’s been unambiguously discredited. Lather, rinse, repeat.

Next!

 Posted by at 10:38 am
Jan 242017
 

I irritated a few of my friends yesterday. They took issue with the provenance and veracity of a political cartoon I shared.

Good political cartoons are provocative and relatable by design, which is why I don’t consider it particularly important to share it here. Suffice to say there are plausible cases for and against it, mountable by reasonable people.

(See also: just about any single political premise. And if there is a fuss, then I’ll put it up.)

Independently of this stink, my niece in New Mexico wondered last night if our state of discourse was ever going to get any better. I replied that I thought it began getting noticeably worse about 1999, and I’d stopped looking for the bottom. (And that I wished I were joking, but no.) I think three factors converged right before the turn of the century to start this downward spiral.

First was 24-hour news. Oh, I know we’ve had 24-hour news for several decades, but it was constrained by the old paradigm for the first few years. It was a formatted newscast on repeat that changed gradually, half-hour to half-hour, as opposed to a continuously updating stream. We have Desert Shield/Storm to thank for the big shift. Remember? Remember watching the war on TV, as long as you cared to? Remember the talking head on one half, the live stream from the front of the damned missile on the other, and the never-ending crawl on the bottom?

Second was the impeachment of Bill Clinton. There’s not been a more contentious single political event in my lifetime. It started out poorly, and only got worse. We didn’t care a whit about understanding each other. We each had the stink of righteous indignation on us, and we only wanted to dig in more deeply. Morals vs. ethics. Public vs. private. Right vs. wrong.

Third was the coming of age of the Web. The live Web dates to late 1990, but it was 1995 or 1996 before it was safe to assume people would know what you were talking about if you brought it up, and it was another couple of years before it really had its foot on the floor as a vehicle of self-publishing.

And now that’s the easy part. The procedural magic is gone. Now you can publish anything you want to—and consequently, you can read anything you want to.

Enter confirmation bias.

We no longer seek understanding, but validation. We no longer ask “what should I think?” We instead ask “I think x. Am I right?”

(And the fatal problem with that is we will always be able to find someone soberly and competently espousing x.)

Desert Storm acclimated us to continuous information. Clinton’s impeachment taught us to dig in. And the Web tied it all together, enabling us to “prove” that whatever we think is right.

And down we went. And here we are.

It’s gotten far too easy for any of us to feel that intoxicating swell of validation. And we’re conditioned to stop when we feel it; stop resisting, stop questioning, stop probing. We’re with our tribe. That warmth is washing over us. We can’t possibly be wrong.

What will it take to flush us from our discursive adolescence?

You think definitive proof of extraterrestrial intelligence would do it?

 Posted by at 7:00 am
Nov 292016
 

Just climbed out of the bathroom with the family and the dog. Wow. We haven’t done that since the boys got all spindly. (And kudos to everyone for being reasonably sweet-smelling.) So we went from no significant rain for seven months to a line of severe thunderstorms with embedded tornadoes. It’s not over as I […]

 Posted by at 11:20 pm

BoWilliams.com is using WP-Gravatar